Purpose
Choose the workflow and the business question.
How the product works
Shomer compares approved work evidence with company standards to surface workflow friction, competency gaps and practical improvement options. It does not act on its own.
The Shomer decision flow
The product explains the pattern and presents options. Your organisation remains responsible for the evidence, interpretation and decision.
Company standards and permitted work evidence
Workflow friction, competency gaps and practical options
A named reviewer checks and a decision-maker approves
Test one change, compare the baseline, keep, change or stop
No change happens without a named human decision-maker.
Control points
Control is a working responsibility, not a disclaimer at the bottom of the page.
Choose the workflow and the business question.
Agree what work material is permitted and what stays out.
Name the person who checks Shomer's output and missing context.
Name the leader who approves, changes or stops the proposed test.
Current commercial entry
Today's pilot applies this approach to one browser-based cleaning report assembly workflow. It does not define the broader product.
Record supervisor time and rework for one existing browser-based report assembly workflow.
Keep the report type, site or small group, reviewer and decision-maker clear.
The named reviewer examines the report before anyone relies on the result.
Compare the agreed measures, state the limits and choose whether to keep, change or stop.
A practical first conversation
We will scope the people, permitted material, baseline and result worth testing.